Sunday, March 13, 2016

EEG feature of fear downregulation

How do you identify fear immediately? How do you classify fear from EEG? How would you quantify fear? These questions bothered me in the beginning when I started researching the intersection of emotions, affective physiological responses and EEG signal processing. I imagined a biofeedback computer game / therapy program that helps people conquer their fears by rewarding them in the process. As time went on, my empirical knowledge and experimental data were extended, which, though changed the questions, not the vision. Here I'd like to outline how it all happened, what are the results and prospects of the research.

Experiment

While reading papers on EEG response upon fear stimulation, I was quite annoyed that the stimuli used in previous experiments were mostly IAPS images or video clips from horror movies (yeah, The Shining) completely taken out of context. To this day I believe that such stimuli are not sufficient to evoke strong enough emotional responses in a time period higher than a couple of seconds, and thus unable to provide insight into the big picture of fear regulation.

The experimental design hasn't changed much since my previous measurements, but gameplay and webcam videos were also recorded this time, in addition to EEG, heart rate (HR), and galvanic skin response (GSR) vital signals. First open-, then closed-eye measurements were taken for Individual Alpha Frequency estimation. Participants then played the "daylight" version of a computer FPS game as the baseline measurement. Only the "night" version contained fear inducing stimuli.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Bit of insight into payment habits - a Bitcoin blockchain investigation

As a project work, I looked at the dynamics of transactions in the Bitcoin cryptocurrency system. Delay times between consecutive payments were analysed to investigate their distribution - a distribution that could predict the next time an individual intends to spend money. This study is inspired by (Barabási 2005), a paper showing that human dynamics follow a fat-tailed power-law distribution in terms of certain tasks, like e-mail communication. It is yet to be examined if payment habits exhibit the same behavior or not. [Note: a fat-, or heavy-tailed distribution in this case is characterized by long waiting times, and burst like activities - e.g. we usually send e-mails in batches, time to time, and not in every hour a mail.]

Transactions, or payments, of 59490 accounts were fetched from the Bitcoin blockchain by calling the API of blockchain.info. Accounts were then filtered by the amount of payments initiated – minimum number of 60 transactions was required – in order to leave out bitcoin addresses used once (“Protect Your Privacy - Bitcoin” 2016) or just a few times. Account information of 6729 Bitcoin addresses made to the analysis phase in the end.

Inter-payment delay times of two accounts. Tall spikes suggests a heavy-tailed distribution - long waiting times (delay time in seconds).